KCEC
(Kirr's Chess Engine Comparison)
A tournament of original free chess engines
June 16, 2013
Testing summary:
Total: 135,679 games
played by 202 programs
1398 CPU days (X2 4600+)

White wins: 55,227 (40.7%)
Black wins: 47,434 (35.0%)
Draws: 33,018 (24.3%)
White score: 52.9%

Engine Details

Options
Show each game results
Little Goliath 3.12 Evolution (TB On) UCI (2607+19
−19
)Quote
Author: Michael Borgstadt (Germany) Released: 2006-03-02Link: Homepage
This engine is stable and runs without issues.
This is one of the 2 Little Goliath versions we tested: Compare them!
OpponentEloDiffResultsScoreLOSPerfPond
hit
Eval
diff
–   Frenzee 3.0 64-bit2711+19
−19
(+104)11 − 14
(+8−11=6)
44.0%
11.0 / 25
0.0%
+64
50.8%
1835
0.79
933
1 0 = 0 0 1 1 1 = = 1 0 = 0 0 0 = = 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
–   SOS 5.12697+18
−18
(+90)6 − 19
(+3−16=6)
24.0%
6.0 / 25
0.0%
−96
52.6%
1596
0.62
839
1 = 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 0 = 0 0 0 = 0 = 0 0 0 0
–   Colossus 2007c2694+19
−19
(+87)13 − 15
(+9−11=8)
46.4%
13.0 / 28
0.0%
+66
53.9%
2169
0.71
1169
0 0 = 0 1 = 0 1 = 0 1 0 1 0 = 1 = 0 1 0 = 1 = 0 1 = 1 0
–   Ruffian 1.0.52687+17
−17
(+80)8.5 − 17.5
(+5−14=7)
32.7%
8.5 / 26
0.0%
−39
55.5%
1928
0.73
1071
= = 0 0 = 1 = = 0 1 0 = 0 0 = 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
–   Petir 4.392682+18
−18
(+75)8.5 − 16.5
(+3−11=11)
34.0%
8.5 / 25
0.0%
−21
54.0%
1254
0.87
677
= = = = = 1 0 = = 0 = 0 0 = 1 0 = 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 =
–   Pseudo 0.7c2680+18
−18
(+73)10 − 14
(+3−7=14)
41.7%
10.0 / 24
0.0%
+27
57.2%
993
0.74
568
= 0 = = = = = 0 = = 1 0 1 0 = 0 1 = = = 0 = 0 =
–   Aristarch 4.502671+18
−18
(+64)8.5 − 16.5
(+4−12=9)
34.0%
8.5 / 25
0.0%
−38
52.1%
1326
0.74
691
= 1 = 0 = 0 1 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 = = 0 = = =
–   Petir 4.9999992670+19
−19
(+63)9 − 15
(+6−12=6)
37.5%
9.0 / 24
0.0%
−26
55.9%
1810
0.97
1012
0 1 0 0 0 = 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 = = = 0 = = 0 1
–   Hamsters 0.62669+18
−18
(+62)11.5 − 13.5
(+8−10=7)
46.0%
11.5 / 25
0.0%
+35
52.5%
1932
0.99
1014
1 = = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 = 1 0 0 1 = = 1 0 = =
–   Booot 4.13.12668+18
−18
(+61)7.5 − 14.5
(+4−11=7)
34.1%
7.5 / 22
0.0%
−46
55.2%
1347
0.66
743
0 0 1 = 1 0 1 0 = 1 = = 0 = 0 0 = 0 0 0 = 0
–   BugChess2 1.5.22661+18
−18
(+54)13.5 − 14.5
(+11−12=5)
48.2%
13.5 / 28
0.0%
+41
48.3%
2366
1.00
1143
0 0 1 1 = = = 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 = 0 0 = 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
–   Jonny 2.832652+17
−17
(+45)8.5 − 12.5
(+6−10=5)
40.5%
8.5 / 21
0.0%
−21
47.9%
1638
0.78
784
= 0 1 = 0 1 = 0 0 = 0 1 = 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
–   Crafty 21.5 64-bit PS2652+17
−17
(+45)15.5 − 12.5
(+11−8=9)
55.4%
15.5 / 28
0.0%
+84
53.1%
1664
0.83
884
1 = 1 = = 0 = 0 1 0 0 1 1 = 0 0 = 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 = = = 1
–   The Baron 1.8.12651+18
−18
(+44)10 − 13
(+7−10=6)
43.5%
10.0 / 23
0.0%
0
49.7%
1574
0.70
782
1 = = 1 0 1 0 = = 1 = 1 0 = 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
–   Anaconda 2.0.12644+17
−17
(+37)12.5 − 13.5
(+8−9=9)
48.1%
12.5 / 26
0.1%
+26
53.7%
1379
0.80
741
= 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 = = = 0 = 1 0 1 0 1 0 = = 0 = =
–   Movei 00.8.4032643+22
−22
(+36)5.5 − 14.5
(+2−11=7)
27.5%
5.5 / 20
0.5%
−112
53.8%
1225
0.77
659
= = 0 0 0 = 0 = 1 1 0 = 0 0 0 = 0 = 0 0
–   Fritz 5.322643+17
−17
(+36)6.5 − 14.5
(+4−12=5)
31.0%
6.5 / 21
0.1%
−101
55.1%
1352
0.97
745
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 = 0 0 1 1 = = 0 0 1 = = 0 0
–   Ktulu 4.22634+17
−17
(+27)17.5 − 10.5
(+13−6=9)
62.5%
17.5 / 28
1.4%
+110
52.4%
1925
0.91
1008
1 1 1 = = 0 1 0 1 1 = 1 = = = 0 1 = = 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 = 1
–   Thinker 4.7a2634+17
−17
(+27)14 − 14
(+9−9=10)
50.0%
14.0 / 28
1.3%
+27
53.6%
2215
0.93
1188
= 1 0 1 = = 0 0 = 0 1 = = = 1 0 1 = 1 1 = = 0 1 1 0 0 0
–   SmarThink 0.17a2633+16
−16
(+26)12 − 16
(+7−11=10)
42.9%
12.0 / 28
1.5%
−19
51.0%
1837
0.66
936
0 0 0 = = 1 = = 1 0 0 = 1 = 0 0 = 0 0 1 0 = 1 = 1 0 = 1
–   Ufim 8.022628+18
−18
(+21)12 − 16
(+8−12=8)
42.9%
12.0 / 28
4.6%
−31
56.0%
2020
0.61
1132
0 1 1 0 1 = 1 = 0 0 0 = = 0 = 0 0 0 0 1 1 = 1 = 0 0 = 1
–   Fritz 6 Light2627+19
−19
(+20)11 − 17
(+6−12=10)
39.3%
11.0 / 28
6.4%
−48
56.9%
1321
0.90
751
0 0 0 0 = = 1 = = 0 0 0 0 0 = = 0 0 = 0 1 1 1 1 1 = = =
–   Trace 1.37a2622+17
−17
(+15)12 − 14
(+9−11=6)
46.2%
12.0 / 26
10.6%
−9
52.8%
1991
0.82
1052
= 1 = 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 = 1 0 1 0 = 1 1 0 = = 0 1
–   AnMon 5.602621+18
−18
(+14)16 − 12
(+13−9=6)
57.1%
16.0 / 28
13.3%
+63
50.0%
1885
0.82
943
1 0 = 0 = 1 1 1 0 = 0 0 1 1 0 0 = 0 1 1 1 0 1 = 1 = 1 1
–   E.T. Chess 18.11.052620+21
−21
(+13)12 − 15
(+9−12=6)
44.4%
12.0 / 27
17.4%
−29
51.0%
1796
0.77
916
0 0 1 = 0 1 1 0 0 1 = 1 0 0 1 1 = 1 0 0 0 = = = 0 1 0
–   Yace 0.99.872609+17
−17
(+2)10.5 − 16.5
(+7−13=7)
38.9%
10.5 / 27
44.5%
−72
54.6%
1989
0.77
1085
1 = 1 0 0 1 0 = 0 = 0 0 0 1 1 = = = 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
–   Hamsters 0.52595+21
−21
(−12)15.5 − 9.5
(+10−4=11)
62.0%
15.5 / 25
81.6%
+61
54.6%
1344
1.04
734
= 1 1 0 = = = 0 1 = = 1 1 1 0 1 0 = 1 = 1 1 = = =
–   Green Light Chess 3.002582+17
−17
(−25)15.5 − 12.5
(+11−8=9)
55.4%
15.5 / 28
98.1%
+11
50.7%
2333
0.97
1183
= = 0 = = 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 = 1 1 0 0 0 1 = 0 = 0 = = 1 1
–   Tao 5.62574+17
−17
(−33)18.5 − 10.5
(+15−7=7)
63.8%
18.5 / 29
99.7%
+70
53.5%
2122
1.11
1136
= 1 1 0 0 1 = = = 0 0 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 = 0 = 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
–   Twisted Logic 20080404x2568+18
−18
(−39)11.5 − 13.5
(+7−9=9)
46.0%
11.5 / 25
99.9%
−63
52.5%
1337
1.11
702
0 1 1 = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 = 1 1 = 0 = = = = 1 0 1 = =
–   Arasan 10.0 64-bit2564+17
−17
(−43)18.5 − 8.5
(+16−6=5)
68.5%
18.5 / 27
100.0%
+93
54.9%
2419
0.74
1327
0 1 = = 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 = 1 1 = 0 0
–   Abrok 5.02561+17
−17
(−46)16.5 − 11.5
(+14−9=5)
58.9%
16.5 / 28
100.0%
+18
51.2%
2622
0.81
1342
1 1 1 0 = 0 = 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 = 0 = 1 0 0 1 1 = 1 0 1 1 0
–   Amyan 1.5972552+17
−17
(−55)16.5 − 10.5
(+13−7=7)
61.1%
16.5 / 27
100.0%
+23
53.5%
1846
1.06
987
= 0 = 1 = 1 = 1 0 1 = = 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 = 1 0
–   SpiderChess 0706032546+17
−17
(−61)13.5 − 12.5
(+8−7=11)
51.9%
13.5 / 26
100.0%
−48
53.2%
1533
0.75
815
1 = 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 = = = = 0 0 0 = 1 0 = = = = =
–   Quark 2.352536+16
−16
(−71)11 − 9
(+8−6=6)
55.0%
11.0 / 20
100.0%
−40
53.9%
1254
0.92
676
= 1 1 = 0 = 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 = 1 1 1 = =
–   Gaia 3.5 64-bit2536+17
−17
(−71)17 − 15
(+10−8=14)
53.1%
17.0 / 32
100.0%
−49
55.1%
1644
1.13
906
0 0 = = 0 = = = 1 1 = = 0 = 1 1 1 1 1 0 = = 0 = 1 = 1 = 0 0 = 1
–   Dragon 4.62524+16
−16
(−83)16 − 9
(+12−5=8)
64.0%
16.0 / 25
100.0%
+8
53.2%
1623
0.94
864
= = 1 = = 0 1 = 1 0 1 0 1 = 1 1 1 1 = 1 0 = 0 1 1
–   Nejmet 3.072521+16
−16
(−86)15 − 10
(+13−8=4)
60.0%
15.0 / 25
100.0%
−8
51.9%
2026
1.09
1052
1 0 = 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 = 0 1 1 1 = 0 1 1 = 0 0
–   Snitch 1.6.2 32-bit2521+15
−15
(−86)17 − 9
(+14−6=6)
65.4%
17.0 / 26
100.0%
+24
54.2%
1790
1.00
970
0 = 1 1 0 0 = = 1 1 = 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 0 = 1 1 1 1
–   Comet B682478+14
−14
(−129)18.5 − 8.5
(+13−3=11)
68.5%
18.5 / 27
100.0%
−11
54.0%
1668
0.89
900
1 1 = 0 = 1 1 1 = 1 = 1 1 1 = = = 1 = 0 = 1 1 0 = 1 =
–   Sjeng 12.132475+14
−14
(−132)20.5 − 8.5
(+17−5=7)
70.7%
20.5 / 29
100.0%
+16
55.2%
1888
0.91
1042
1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 = 1 1 = 1 0 = = 1 = 1 1 1 1 0 = = 1 1 1 1

Performance

This figure shows how this engine performs depending on how strong is the opponent. Regression:

Perf = C − 0.023 [±0.270] * Opp

Where 'Opp' is the opponent's rating. 95% confidence intervals are in the brackets.

Rating changes by day

Rating changes with played games


Created in 2005-2012 by Kirill Kryukov
Updated on June 16, 2013