Did hiarcs use book against rybka in the following game?

Questions and comments related to CCRL testing study
Post Reply
Uri Blass
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:44 pm
Sign-up code: 0

Did hiarcs use book against rybka in the following game?

Post by Uri Blass »

Looking at some of rybka losses I found that in the following game hiarcs used book when rybka was out of book because d6 and Bd7 played in 0 seconds when white used time


[Event "CCRL 40/40"]
[Site "CCRL"]
[Date "2007.06.21"]
[Round "1.63"]
[White "Rybka 2.3.2a 64-bit 4CPU"]
[Black "Hiarcs 11.1 4CPU"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B45"]
[WhiteElo "3122"]
[BlackElo "2986"]
[PlyCount "168"]
[EventDate "2007.??.??"]

1. e4 {0s} c5 {0s} 2. Nf3 {0s} e6 {0s} 3. Nc3 {0s} Nc6 {0s} 4. d4 {0s} cxd4 {0s
} 5. Nxd4 {0s} Nf6 {0s} 6. Bf4 {Both last book move 0s} d6 {-0.01/1 0s} 7. Bb5
{+0.18/17 58s} Bd7 {-0.01/1 0s} 8. Nb3 {+0.14/17 67s} a6 {+0.47/16 92s} 9. Be2
{+0.14/18 46s} Qc7 {+0.45/16 61s} 10. O-O {+0.08/17 51s} Be7 {+0.21/16 69s} 11.
Qd3 {(Qd2) +0.02/16 49s} Ne5 {(0-0) +0.14/16 63s} 12. Qg3 {+0.07/17 124s} O-O {
+0.17/15 60s} 13. Nd4 {+0.00/17 53s} Bc6 {+0.15/14 64s} 14. Qe3 {
(Nxc6) -0.02/17 66s} b5 {-0.08/16 64s} 15. a3 {-0.04/17 87s} Bb7 {-0.16/16 51s}
16. Rad1 {(Rfd1) -0.12/16 140s} Rac8 {-0.24/16 65s} 17. h3 {(Nb3) -0.14/16 66s}
Qc5 {-0.42/15 59s} 18. Rfe1 {(Bg3) -0.18/17 136s} Ng6 {(Rfd8) -0.44/16 65s} 19.
Bh2 {-0.18/17 42s} Bd8 {(Rfd8) -0.49/16 66s} 20. Bf1 {(Qf3) -0.29/15 49s} Bb6 {
-0.57/15 54s} 21. Qg3 {(Qf3) -0.34/16 46s} Bc7 {(Ne5) -0.51/16 113s} 22. Qf3 {
-0.29/16 44s} Ne5 {-0.60/15 48s} 23. Qe2 {(Qg3) -0.26/15 15s} Nc4 {
(h6) -1.14/16 51s} 24. b4 {-0.25/19 69s} Qg5 {-0.96/17 100s} 25. a4 {
(Nf3) -0.17/18 15s} Nb2 {-0.98/15 42s} 26. axb5 {(Nf3) -0.23/17 13s} Nxd1 {
-0.92/17 176s} 27. Qxd1 {(Rxd1) -0.41/18 23s} a5 {-1.57/15 37s} 28. Nf3 {
(Nc6) -0.43/19 66s} Qh5 {(Qg6) -1.25/17 133s} 29. Qd4 {-0.16/17 17s} axb4 {
-1.03/16 97s} 30. Qxb4 {-0.16/18 69s} Rfd8 {-1.00/16 61s} 31. Nd2 {
(Bd3) -0.13/17 53s} d5 {(Qg5) -1.34/15 54s} 32. Bxc7 {-0.20/18 30s} Rxc7 {
-1.02/17 34s} 33. b6 {-0.26/18 23s} Rcc8 {-0.89/16 48s} 34. e5 {
(exd5) -0.18/19 66s} Nd7 {-1.07/16 54s} 35. Nf3 {-0.16/18 25s} d4 {-0.91/16 90s
} 36. Nxd4 {-0.14/17 45s} Rb8 {(Nxe5) -0.89/15 52s} 37. Na4 {-0.29/17 137s}
Nxe5 {-0.79/16 59s} 38. Nc5 {-0.38/18 96s} Qh4 {-0.80/16 60s} 39. Nc6 {
-0.44/19 76s} Qxb4 {-0.39/18 51s} 40. Nxb4 {-0.50/21 60s} Nd7 {-0.41/19 49s}
41. Na4 {(Nxd7) -0.50/21 48s} Rbc8 {-0.80/17 97s} 42. f3 {(Rd1) -0.60/20 266s}
Kf8 {-1.01/17 68s} 43. Rb1 {(Rd1) -0.56/20 165s} Nc5 {(Ke7) -1.22/16 47s} 44.
Nb2 {(Nxc5) -0.54/19 157s} e5 {(Ra8) -1.04/18 131s} 45. Nc4 {-0.54/18 119s} e4
{-1.03/17 48s} 46. fxe4 {-0.55/19 148s} Bxe4 {-1.07/17 67s} 47. Kf2 {
(Be2) -0.57/16 40s} Rd4 {(f5) -1.32/15 96s} 48. Ke3 {-0.55/16 13s} Rcd8 {
(Rd7) -1.35/15 35s} 49. g3 {(Na5) -0.70/17 51s} Bb7 {(R4d7) -1.55/14 52s} 50.
Bd3 {-0.84/19 30s} h6 {(R4d7) -1.51/16 76s} 51. g4 {(Na5) -0.67/17 29s} g6 {
(R4d7) -1.53/15 94s} 52. Ra1 {(Na5) -0.92/17 37s} R4d7 {-1.38/15 49s} 53. Ra7 {
(Kd2) -0.85/19 142s} Re7+ {-1.60/16 55s} 54. Kd2 {-0.81/19 25s} Ne4+ {
-1.42/17 71s} 55. Kc1 {-0.82/20 20s} Nf2 {-1.25/16 43s} 56. Na5 {
(Ne5) -0.89/20 68s} Rd6 {-1.59/16 47s} 57. Nc4 {-0.96/20 31s} Rde6 {
-1.65/17 48s} 58. Kd2 {(Na6) -0.94/20 42s} Nxh3 {-1.75/16 44s} 59. Na6 {
-1.06/20 53s} Bxa6 {-1.73/17 48s} 60. Rxa6 {-1.04/22 104s} Rb7 {
(Re8) -1.72/18 48s} 61. Ra8+ {-0.95/21 73s} Kg7 {-1.74/19 48s} 62. Rd8 {
-0.99/21 17s} Nf2 {-1.76/18 47s} 63. Rd4 {-1.03/21 61s} Nxd3 {-1.77/19 49s} 64.
Rxd3 {(Kxd3) -1.11/21 62s} Rb8 {-1.82/18 55s} 65. Kc3 {(Rb3) -1.20/20 40s} Re4
{-2.03/18 37s} 66. Nd6 {(Rd7) -1.57/20 78s} Rxg4 {-2.95/19 57s} 67. b7 {
-1.49/21 14s} Ra4 {-2.75/19 55s} 68. Kb3 {-1.57/22 17s} Ra6 {-2.52/19 67s} 69.
c4 {-1.46/22 11s} Rxd6 {-2.69/19 39s} 70. Rxd6 {-1.32/20 0s} Rxb7+ {
-2.69/20 37s} 71. Kc3 {(Ka4) -1.87/23 50s} Rb1 {(h5) -3.08/19 54s} 72. c5 {
(Kd2) -1.80/23 41s} Rc1+ {-3.45/19 32s} 73. Kb4 {-2.51/24 56s} h5 {-3.63/19 54s
} 74. Kb5 {(c6) -2.86/24 25s} h4 {(g5) -3.97/18 55s} 75. Rd3 {-3.14/24 26s} g5
{-4.23/18 56s} 76. c6 {-3.41/23 13s} Kg6 {(f5) -4.70/18 57s} 77. Kb6 {
-4.83/22 81s} g4 {-5.28/17 36s} 78. Rd6+ {(Rd8) -4.55/20 63s} Kf5 {
(f6) -7.45/16 66s} 79. c7 {-5.09/15 49s} Rxc7 {-9.97/17 43s} 80. Rd5+ {
-5.09/15 39s} Ke4 {(Ke6) -11.34/17 61s} 81. Rh5 {-5.01/15 528s} g3 {
(Rc3) -20.45/19 51s} 82. Rxh4+ {-7.01/15 409s} Kf3 {(Kf5) -21.14/21 52s} 83.
Rh7 {-16.58/14 317s} g2 {(Rc2) -28.04/18 68s} 84. Rh3+ {-13.00/12 93s} Ke2 {
(Kg4) -28.29/18 69s} 0-1
User avatar
Shaun
Posts: 6889
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:24 pm
Sign-up code: 10159
Location: Brighton. UK

Re: Did hiarcs use book against rybka in the following game?

Post by Shaun »

Hi Uri,

thanks for highlighting the game, it does look like this one may have slipped through....

Shaun
Ray
Posts: 22577
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:33 pm
Sign-up code: 10159
Location: NZ

Re: Did hiarcs use book against rybka in the following game?

Post by Ray »

Thanks Uri. No time to chase that down this week and remove it, but we will do so as soon as possible. All games from the source pgns will be removed
User avatar
Gabor Szots
Posts: 12824
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:30 am
Sign-up code: 10159
Location: Szentendre, Hungary

Re: Did hiarcs use book against rybka in the following game?

Post by Gabor Szots »

Uri Blass wrote:Looking at some of rybka losses I found that in the following game hiarcs used book when rybka was out of book because d6 and Bd7 played in 0 seconds when white used time
I remember cases when one engine started to calculate then the other engine still moved from book. There were times when both went out of book then returned to book for some more moves.
I think these things happen because of book usage settings. E.g. a condition may exist that a move should be played only if it has at least 2 occurrences. Now if a move did not occur 2 times it will not be played so the engine must calculate. However, if the next book move has once again a frequency of at least 2, it will be played so that the other engine won't have to calculate.
I recommend checking the book line of the cited game and if the situation was as I described above, the game should be retained.
Post Reply