CCRL Discussion Board

http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.live/cgi/compare_engines.cgi?family=Ghost&print=Rating+list&print=Results+table&print=LOS+table&print=Ponder+hit+table&print=Eval+difference+table&print=Comopp+gamenum+table&print=Overlap+table&print=Score+with+common+opponent...

Hi,

are there any new results? When will Ghost 2.0.1 be included on the CCRL 40/4 Rating List?

Thanks for the testing!

Michael

Adam Hair wrote:Here are the results after 435 of 1216 games:

Code: Select all

Ghost 2.0.1 32-bit            : 435 (+194,= 97,-144), 55.7 %
...

At this point, Ghost 2.01 32-bit is rated at 2495 Elo on the free, single cpu, pure list. That is an improvement
of 291 Elo over Ghost 0.14

Nice!

It can happen fairly soon. I am always eager to include an engine when an author makes a request.[/quote]

Ok, just to make sure: you can understand that as an official request.

I didn't see any postings related to 40/4 test matches yet, I'll be looking forward to that...

This might be the wrong place to ask, but how can I get the testers to include Ghost 2.0.1 in the 40/4 testing? It has shown some nice results in 40/40, so I'm curious to see how it performs under shorter time limits.

In all my tests, Ghost 2 (and Ghost 2.0.1) and most test versions I played always scored positively against Ares 1.004 (I played games from 2 min to 25 min repeating in Arena and ChessGui). Typically, it scores around 66%-70% against Ares 1.004 heads-up. It also usually scores over 70% against Waxma...

20TH AMATEUR SERIES (Division 6) Intel Q6600 Quad Core ChessGUI 128mb hash each 3-4-5 piece tablebases Ponder off HS-Large Remis book (limited to 12 moves) 40 moves in 32 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL) 4 cycles 44 rounds All engines 32-bit 1CPU Hi, I don't know if this is the right place ...

Hi, sorry if I write in the wrong place, I am new to this forum. I am Michael Classen, Philipp's brother (the author of Ghost). I wanted to ask whether Ghost 2 was used with Nalimov database support? Also, I have been working on finding better settings for the settings.cfg file and came up with a ve...